Between procedure and practice. Start with a Review: fixed scope, a finding you own either way →

Why Integr8te

Operator-grade integrity.
AI-amplified delivery.

The seat we have held.

The organisations we serve are under-resourced, carrying poor workflows, short of strategy and vision in exactly the areas that leak budget. We know because we have held the seat.

Our founder owned an asset owner's risk-based inspection programme, led a class survey on a major floating asset, then served as CAA UAV Accountable Manager for remote inspection operations. We have watched technical authority succession fail from the inside. We have carried the accountability that a regulated safety regime assigns to a named person.

The table we sit at.

Governance practice is only as good as the standards behind it. Integr8te's founder co-chairs OEUK's Asset Integrity Technical Group alongside the HSE principal mechanical regulator, plus supports the writing of the Energy Institute guidance on the use of big data and AI in integrity data.

Our clients get practical insight into where expectation is heading, rather than only where it stands.

BSI Lead Auditor

ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 42001, quality and AI management systems

Co-chair, OEUK Asset Integrity Technical Group

At the table where integrity expectations are set for one of the most heavily regulated industries there is

Energy Institute guidance contributor

Supports the writing of the guidance on the use of big data and AI in integrity data

CAA UAV Accountable Manager

Named accountability for remote inspection operations

How we hold ourselves.

Delivery runs under a quality management system aligned with ISO 9001: documented processes, evidenced decisions, corrective actions logged and closed. Built and maintained by a BSI-trained Lead Auditor. We are happy to show it.

Proof

The model is live with our anchor client in high hazard operations: accountability mapping, problem-area delivery, dashboarded governance.

base44
Edit with Base44